David Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”. (Length:27:28)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8675", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_53__April_2019.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/professionals/david-r-pekarek-krohn.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">David Pekarek Krohn</a> and <a href="https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/professionals/danielle-n-grant-keane.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Danielle Grant-Keane</a> of <a href="https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Perkins Coie LLP</a> discuss “<a href="https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/news-insights/the-coming-wave-preparing-for-the-rise-of-patent-litigation-in.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector</a>”. (Length:27:28)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8675", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_53__April_2019.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_53__April_2019.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_53__April_2019.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 53 — April 2019

Johannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?” (Length:10:20)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8454", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_52__February_2019.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.orrick.com/People/B/F/2/Johannes-Hsu" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Johannes Hsu</a> of <a href="http://www.orrick.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP</a> in Irvine, California discusses the <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/oregon/ordce/3:2018cv00326/135483/88/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Tabaian v. Intel Corp.</a> decision and his paper “<a href="https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/disqualifying-an-expert-when-is-an-60615/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?</a>” (Length:10:20)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8454", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_52__February_2019.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_52__February_2019.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_52__February_2019.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 52 — February 2019

Dr. Sarah Kagan of Banner &amp; Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad. (Length: 19:55)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8224", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_51__November_2018.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://bannerwitcoff.com/people/skagan/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dr. Sarah Kagan</a> of <a href="https://bannerwitcoff.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Banner &amp; Witcoff</a> in Washington D.C. discusses “<a href="https://bannerwitcoff.com/ip-alert-patent-wars-genome-editing/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Patent Wars: Genome Editing</a>” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1907.Opinion.9-10-2018.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">U Cal v. Broad</a>. (Length: 19:55)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8224", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_51__November_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_51__November_2018.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_51__November_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 51 — November 2018

Eric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick &amp; West discuss their article “Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might” regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3581", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_50__November_2018.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.fenwick.com/professionals/Pages/ericball.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Eric Ball</a> and <a href="https://www.fenwick.com/professionals/Pages/athulacharya.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Athul Acharya</a> of <a href="https://www.fenwick.com/pages/default.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Fenwick &amp; West</a> discuss their article “<a href="https://www.fenwick.com/publications/Pages/Honey-Badger-Dont-Care-but-the-Lanham-Act-Might.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might</a>” regarding <a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/30/16-56715.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gordon v. Drape Creative</a> and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3581", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_50__November_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_50__November_2018.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_50__November_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 50 — November 2018

Christopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper &amp; Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?” (Length: 20:08)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1924", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_49__October_2018.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.fitzpatrickcella.com/attorneys/christopher-e-loh/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Christopher Loh</a> of <a href="https://www.fitzpatrickcella.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Fitzpatrick Cella Harper &amp; Scinto</a> in New York City discusses the <a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1480.Opinion.10-2-2017.1.PDF" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision</a> and his paper “<a href="http://www.fitzpatrickcella.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?</a>” (Length: 20:08)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1924", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_49__October_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_49__October_2018.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_49__October_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 49 — October 2018

Linda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment. (Length: 21:06)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8978", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_48__September_2018.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.finnegan.com/en/professionals/linda-a-wadler.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Linda Wadler</a> and <a href="https://www.finnegan.com/en/professionals/alissa-k-lipton.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Alissa Lipton</a> of <a href="https://www.finnegan.com/en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Finnegan</a> discuss the SCOTUS decision in <a href="https://www.eff.org/files/2018/06/22/westerngeco_v_ion_opinion.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical</a> regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. <a href="https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/the-supreme-court-permits-recovery-of-lost-profits-for-foreign-uses-in-westerngeco-llc-v.-ion-geophysical-corp.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Their case comment.</a> (Length: 21:06)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8978", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_48__September_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_48__September_2018.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_48__September_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 48 — September 2018

Don Cameron of Bereskin &amp; Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4616", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_April_2018.mp3?dest-id=26959",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

Don Cameron of <a href="https://www.bereskinparr.com/overview" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bereskin &amp; Parr LLP</a> and Jerry Chen of <a href="http://www.jerrychen.ca" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">JZC Intellectual Property La</a>w discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4616", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_April_2018.mp3?dest-id=26959" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_April_2018.mp3?dest-id=26959</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_April_2018.mp3?dest-id=26959" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 47 — April 2018

Prof. Ben Alarie of BlueJ Legal on “Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes”. (Length: 43:19)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1145", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_46_-_January_2018.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.bluejlegal.com/thestory" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Prof. Ben Alarie</a> of <a href="https://www.bluejlegal.com/thestory" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">BlueJ Legal</a> on “<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2855977" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes</a>”. (Length: 43:19)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1145", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_46_-_January_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_46_-_January_2018.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_46_-_January_2018.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 46 — January 2018

Micheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin &amp; Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca (Length: 55:16)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4182", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_45__July_2017.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3 

<a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/People/Micheline-Gravelle" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Micheline Gravelle</a>, <a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/People/Donald-H-MacOdrum" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Don MacOdrum</a>, <a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/People/Michael-Fenwick/?srch=F" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Mike Fenwick</a> and <a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/People/Donald-M-Cameron" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Don Cameron</a> of <a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bereskin &amp; Parr</a> LLP discuss “<a href="http://www.jurisdiction.com/astra.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Promise of the Patent</a>” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s <a href="https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16713/index.do" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">decision in Astrazeneca</a> (Length: 55:16)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4182", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_45__July_2017.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_45__July_2017.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_45__July_2017.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 45 — July 2017

John Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”. (Length: 28:29)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9146", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_March_2017_-_Featuring_John_Crittenden.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.cooley.com/people/john-crittenden" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">John Crittenden</a> of <a href="https://www.cooley.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Cooley</a> discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “<a href="https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2016/2016-10-27-squirrels-armed-with-bazookas" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Squirrels Armed with Bazookas</a>”. (Length: 28:29)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9146", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_March_2017_-_Featuring_John_Crittenden.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_March_2017_-_Featuring_John_Crittenden.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_March_2017_-_Featuring_John_Crittenden.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 44 — March 2017

JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast

Jeanne M. Gills of Foley &amp; Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3397", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_42__July_2016.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="https://www.foley.com/jeanne-m-gills/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jeanne M. Gills</a> of <a href="https://www.foley.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Foley &amp; Lardner LLP</a> in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (<a href="http://www.foley.com/files/uploads/AIPLA%20Article%20on%20DTSA%20and%20Reasonable%20Efforts%20to%20Protect%20Trade%20Secrets%2048.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">article</a>, <a href="http://www.foley.com/files/uploads/AIPLA%20Spring%202016%20Trade%20Secrets%20Presentation%204827-8788-1521%20v1.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">slides</a>). (Length: 39:22)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 }); AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3397", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_42__July_2016.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_42__July_2016.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/Episode_42__July_2016.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

Episode 42 — July 2016

In Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use.  Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy &amp; Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3254", {soundFile: "http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2009_-_Featuring_Jonathan_Hudis_and_Kimbery_Seluga.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1448.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">In Re Bose</a> and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: <a href="Jonathan Hudis " rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jonathan Hudis</a> of <a href="http://www.oblon.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP</a> and <a href="http://sunsteinlaw.com/attorneys/k-seluga.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Kimberley Seluga</a> of <a href="http://sunsteinlaw.com/index.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Sunstein Kann Murphy &amp; Timbers LLP</a> <a href="http://sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2009/09/200909_Huston-Seluga.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bose case comment</a>. (Length: 16:54)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3254", {soundFile: "<a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2009_-_Featuring_Jonathan_Hudis_and_Kimbery_Seluga.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2009_-_Featuring_Jonathan_Hudis_and_Kimbery_Seluga.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2009_-_Featuring_Jonathan_Hudis_and_Kimbery_Seluga.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

October 2009 – Episode 10

Jennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length:  17:00)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_5686", {soundFile: "http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2009_-_Featuring_Jennifer_Silverman.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.egsllp.com/JenniferSilverman-A66.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jennifer Silverman</a> of <a href="http://www.egsllp.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP</a> in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/51ad4ccb-6f5b-4dd2-89fa-005e88c85fa8/8/doc/08-3331-cv_opn.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dec. 3, 2009 decision</a> in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_5686", {soundFile: "<a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2009_-_Featuring_Jennifer_Silverman.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2009_-_Featuring_Jennifer_Silverman.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2009_-_Featuring_Jennifer_Silverman.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

December 2009 – Episode 12

The Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the  Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009.  It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and individual docket system the Court has instigated to make litigation faster, more efficient and less expensive.  The Court has similar procedures for patent, tax and admiralty cases. See also the Canadian Federal Court’s Practice Direction on  Streamlining Complex Litigation. (Length: 34:52)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_2817", {soundFile: "http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_June_2009.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/aboutct/black.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Honourable Michael Black AC</a>, the Chief Justice of the <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/index.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Federal Court of Australia</a>, discusses the <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/how/practice_notes_cj30.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases</a> issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/how/practicenotices_nat03.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">case management and individual docket system</a> the Court has instigated to make litigation faster, more efficient and less expensive. The Court has similar procedures for <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/how/practicenotices_nsw37.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">patent</a>, <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/how/practicenotices_nat02.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">tax</a> and <a href="http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/how/practicenotices_nat01.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">admiralty</a> cases. See also the Canadian Federal Court’s Practice Direction on <a href="http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/fct-cf/pdf/Notice%20-%20streamlining%20complex%20litigation%2001-05-2009%20(ENG).pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Streamlining Complex Litigation</a>. (Length: 34:52)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_2817", {soundFile: "<a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_June_2009.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_June_2009.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_June_2009.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

June 2009 – Episode 6

Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_6668", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/April_2012_-_Featuring_Cynthia_Lopez_Beverage.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

Cynthia Lopez Beverage of <a href="http://www.stericsson.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ST Ericsson</a> in Santa Clara California discusses <a href="/documents/beverage.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">“Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”</a>. (Length: 22:23)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_6668", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/April_2012_-_Featuring_Cynthia_Lopez_Beverage.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/April_2012_-_Featuring_Cynthia_Lopez_Beverage.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/April_2012_-_Featuring_Cynthia_Lopez_Beverage.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

April 2012 – Episode 22

Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper &amp; Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9589", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/March_2012_-_Featuring_Robert_Fischer.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.fitzpatrickcella.com/?t=3&amp;A=2112&amp;format=xml&amp;p=2429" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Robert Fischer</a> of <a href="http://www.fitzpatrickcella.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Fitzpatrick Cella Harper &amp; Scinto</a> in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9589", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/March_2012_-_Featuring_Robert_Fischer.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/March_2012_-_Featuring_Robert_Fischer.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/March_2012_-_Featuring_Robert_Fischer.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

March 2012 – Episode 21

Gareth Morgan of Winston &amp; Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length:  35:19)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4163", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2011_-_Featuring_Gareth_Morgan.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.winston.com/index.cfm?contentID=24&amp;itemID=16263" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gareth Morgan</a> of <a href="http://www.winston.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Winston &amp; Strawn LLP</a>, London, England explains the <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/docs/UKSC_2010_0047_Judgment.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly</a> decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4163", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2011_-_Featuring_Gareth_Morgan.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2011_-_Featuring_Gareth_Morgan.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_December_2011_-_Featuring_Gareth_Morgan.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

December 2011 – Episode 20

Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length:  34:12)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4724", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/jurisdiction_november_2011.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.bakerbotts.com/barton-e-showalter/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bart Showalter</a> of <a href="http://www.bakerbotts.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Baker Botts LLP</a> in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4724", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/jurisdiction_november_2011.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/jurisdiction_november_2011.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/jurisdiction_november_2011.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

November 2011 – Episode 19

James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9896", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/May_2012_-_Featuring_James_Gould.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.lockelord.com/jgould/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">James Gould</a>, of <a href="http://www.lockelord.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Locke Lord LLP</a>, New York City discusses <a href="/documents/gouldonsuperman.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">“Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle”</a> (Length: 15:20)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9896", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/May_2012_-_Featuring_James_Gould.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/May_2012_-_Featuring_James_Gould.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/May_2012_-_Featuring_James_Gould.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

May 2012 – Episode 23

Trevor Cook of Bird &amp; Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_5347", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/June_2012_-_Featuring_Trevor_Cook.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.twobirds.com/English/Lawyers/Pages/Trevor_Cook1.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Trevor Cook</a> of <a href="http://www.twobirds.com/english/Pages/Welcome.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bird &amp; Bird</a>, London England discusses <a href="http://www.whoswholegal.com/news/features/article/29581/english-patent-litigation-8211-new-management/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">“English Patent Litigation – Under New Management”</a> (Length: 17:53)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_5347", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/June_2012_-_Featuring_Trevor_Cook.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/June_2012_-_Featuring_Trevor_Cook.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/June_2012_-_Featuring_Trevor_Cook.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

June 2012 – Episode 24

Paul England of the London Office of Simmons &amp; Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length:  18:22)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_2991", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_December_2010_-_Featuring_Paul_English.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.simmons-simmons.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=offices.people_bio&amp;person_id=4616&amp;page=4334" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Paul England</a> of the London Office of <a href="http://www.simmons-simmons.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Simmons &amp; Simmons</a> discusses “<a href="http://www.jurisdiction.com/englandcross.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Cross-border Injunctions in Europe</a>” (Length: 18:22)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_2991", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_December_2010_-_Featuring_Paul_English.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_December_2010_-_Featuring_Paul_English.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_December_2010_-_Featuring_Paul_English.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

December 2010 – Episode 18

Karen Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_6287", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/July_2012_-_Featuring_Karen_Canady.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://canadylortz.com/canady.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Karen Canady</a> of <a href="http://canadylortz.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">canady + lortz LLP</a> in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_6287", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/July_2012_-_Featuring_Karen_Canady.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/July_2012_-_Featuring_Karen_Canady.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/July_2012_-_Featuring_Karen_Canady.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

July 2012 – Episode 25

Belinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &amp; Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and “A Legal Kaleidoscope – Single Color Trademarks, From pre-Owens-Corning Pink Insulation to Louboutin Red-Soled Shoes” (Length: 30:19)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_7992", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/January_2013_-_Featuring_Belinda_Scrimenti.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.pattishall.com/ourteam/BelindaJScrimenti-116.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Belinda Scrimenti</a> of <a href="http://www.pattishall.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard &amp; Geraldson LLP</a> in Chicago discusses her papers entitled <a href="http://www.pattishall.com/pdf/November%202012%20Newsletter.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">“100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent”</a> and <a href="http://www.pattishall.com/pdf/Single%20Color%20Marks%20from%20Owens%20Corning%20to%20Louboutin.PDF" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">“A Legal Kaleidoscope – Single Color Trademarks, From pre-Owens-Corning Pink Insulation to Louboutin Red-Soled Shoes”</a> (Length: 30:19)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_7992", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/January_2013_-_Featuring_Belinda_Scrimenti.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/January_2013_-_Featuring_Belinda_Scrimenti.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/January_2013_-_Featuring_Belinda_Scrimenti.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

January 2013 – Episode 27

Thomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length:  14:24)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3638", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_November_2010_-_Featuring_Thomas_M._Williams.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.howrey.com/williamst/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Thomas M. Williams</a> of <a href="http://www.howrey.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howrey</a>’s <a href="http://www.howrey.com/false-patent-marking/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">False Marking Task Force</a> in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. <a href="http://www.cameronmackendrick.com/resdmc.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Donald M. Cameron</a> of <a href="http://www.cameronmackendrick.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Cameron MacKendrick LLP</a>, Toronto, Canada: “The <a href="http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/2010/2010fc1011/2010fc1011.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision</a>” (Length: 14:24)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_3638", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_November_2010_-_Featuring_Thomas_M._Williams.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_November_2010_-_Featuring_Thomas_M._Williams.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_-_November_2010_-_Featuring_Thomas_M._Williams.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

November 2010 – Episode 17

Donald M. Cameron of Bereskin &amp; Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4979", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/November_2012_-_Episode_26.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/People/Donald_M__Cameron/?srch=C" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Donald M. Cameron</a> of <a href="http://www.bereskinparr.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bereskin &amp; Parr LLP</a> in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in <a href="http://canlii.ca/en/ca/scc/doc/2012/2012scc60/2012scc60.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Teva v. Pfizer</a> on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_4979", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/November_2012_-_Episode_26.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/November_2012_-_Episode_26.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/November_2012_-_Episode_26.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

November 2012 – Episode 26

Christopher Marchese of Fish &amp; Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?”  See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&amp;R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice book. (Length:  15:13)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8558", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2010_-_Featuring_Christopher_Marchese.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.fr.com/christopher-marchese/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Christopher Marchese</a> of <a href="http://www.fr.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Fish &amp; Richardson</a>, San Diego, California: “<a href="http://www.fr.com/patentdamagesarticle/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?</a>” See also Chris’ <a href="http://patent-damages.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Patent Damages blog</a>, on Twitter (<a href="http://twitter.com/patentdamages" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">patentdamages</a>), the <a href="http://www.fr.com/patentdamages/Generic.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">F&amp;R patent damages web page</a> and <a href="http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/6187/15043897/productdetail.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Patent Damages Law and Practice</a> book. (Length: 15:13)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_8558", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2010_-_Featuring_Christopher_Marchese.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2010_-_Featuring_Christopher_Marchese.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_October_2010_-_Featuring_Christopher_Marchese.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

October 2010 – Episode 16

Frederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length:  30:37)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9697", {soundFile: "http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_August_2010_-_Featuring_Frederick_L._Whitmer.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.kilpatrickstockton.com/en/Who%20We%20Are/Professionals/W/WhitmerFrederickL14627.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Frederick L. Whitmer</a> of <a href="http://www.kilpatrickstockton.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Kilpatrick Stockton LLP</a> in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “<a href="http://kilpatrickstockton.com/en/Knowledge%20Center/Publications/Articles/2010/07/Claim%20Construction%20in%20Patent%20Cases%20A%20Question%20of%20Law.aspx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?</a>”. (Length: 30:37)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_9697", {soundFile: "<a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_August_2010_-_Featuring_Frederick_L._Whitmer.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_August_2010_-_Featuring_Frederick_L._Whitmer.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://media.libsyn.com/media/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_August_2010_-_Featuring_Frederick_L._Whitmer.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

August 2010 – Episode 14

DeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length:  14:24)AudioPlayer.setup("http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1942", {soundFile: "http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_September_2010_-_Featuring_DeAnn_Smith.mp3",  titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); Download MP3

<a href="http://www.foleyhoag.com/People/Attorneys/Smith-DeAnn.aspx?ref=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">DeAnn Smith</a> of <a href="http://www.foleyhoag.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Foley Hoag LLP</a> in Boston, Mass.: “<a href="http://www.jurisdiction.com/dsmith.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts</a>“. (Length: 14:24)AudioPlayer.setup("<a href="http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iplawpodcast.com/wp/wp-content/plugins/simple-audio-player/player/player.swf</a>", { width: 290 });AudioPlayer.embed("audioplayer_1942", {soundFile: "<a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_September_2010_-_Featuring_DeAnn_Smith.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_September_2010_-_Featuring_DeAnn_Smith.mp3</a>", titles: "JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast", autostart: "no", loop: "no", animation: "yes", remaining: "yes", noinfo: "no", initialvolume: "70", buffer: "5", encode: "no", checkpolicy: "no", rtl: "no", width: "100%", transparentpagebg: "no", bg: "E5E5E5", leftbg: "CCCCCC", lefticon: "333333", voltrack: "F2F2F2", volslider: "666666", rightbg: "B4B4B4", rightbghover: "999999", righticon: "333333", righticonhover: "FFFFFF", loader: "009900", track: "FFFFFF", tracker: "DDDDDD", border: "CCCCCC", skip: "666666", text: "333333"}); <a href="http://traffic.libsyn.com/jurisdiction/JurisDiction_September_2010_-_Featuring_DeAnn_Smith.mp3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Download MP3</a>

September 2010 – Episode 15

The best podcasts about ourselves as well as the world through the lense of Science. Specific topics include things about our brain, emotions to biology, physics and more!

Best Episodes on Science, Humans & The World

The best philosophy podcast episodes. Asking questions about how to live a better life, what it means to be and do good, to the idea of God. This topic includes episodes that bring about important questions that everyone should be asking themselves. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!