Pugin v. Garland's guest appearances

Pugin v. Garland

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States

Audio Arguendo

Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Supreme Court of the United States

OwlTail

In Pugin v. Garland, the Court reviewed "whether an offense 'relat[es] to obstruction of justice' under §1101(a)(43)(S) even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending. Dictionary definitions, federal laws, state laws, and the Model Penal Code show that the answer is yes: An offense “relat[es] to obstruction of justice” even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending." Jake Leahy, Host. 

In Pugin v. Garland, the Court reviewed "whether an offense 'relat[es] to obstruction of justice' under §1101(a)(43)(S) even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending. Dictionary definitions, federal laws, state laws, and the Model Penal Code show that the answer is yes: An offense “relat[es] to obstruction of justice” even if the offense does not require that an investigation or proceeding be pending." Jake Leahy, Host.

Pugin v. Garland (Immigration)

Issue(s): To qualify as “an offense relating to obstruction of justice,” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S), must a predicate offense require a nexus with a pending or ongoing investigation or judicial proceeding?  ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Issue(s): To qualify as “an offense relating to obstruction of justice,” <a href="https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/chapter-12-immigration-and-nationality/subchapter-i-general-provisions/section-1101-definitions" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S)</a>, must a predicate offense require a nexus with a pending or ongoing investigation or judicial proceeding? <a href="https://www.patreon.com/supremecourt" rel="payment nofollow" target="_blank">★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★</a>

Pugin v. Garland, No. 22-23 [Arg: 04.17.2023]

Immigration: To qualify as an "offense relating to obstruction of justice," must the predicate offense have a nexus to a pending or ongoing investigation or judicial proceeding? - Argued: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:55:58 EDT

U.S. Supreme Court Pugin v. Garland, Case No. 22-23

A case in which the Court held that Virginia’s offense of accessory after the fact to a felony is an offense relating to obstruction of justice under the Immigration and Nationality Act.