Hannah Haksgaard's guest appearances

Hannah Haksgaard

Credit Hour

Ipse Dixit

Jorge Roig

Charbel Barakat

Jill Hasday

Rebecca Flanagan

Walter I. Gonçalves

Carolyn Shapiro

Tara Aaron Stelluto

Aaron Perzanowski

Ramsi Woodcock

Agnieszka McPeak

Thomas McSweeney

Luke Herrine

Kim Krawiec

Beatrice Lillie

Thea Johnson

OwlTail

USD Associate Professor of Law Hannah Haksgaard Discusses South Dakota’s Early Homestead Days on Credit HourVERMILLION, S.D. – University of South Dakota Associate Professor of Law Hannah Haksgaard discussed her career and research into South Dakota’s early homesteading days on USD's podcast, Credit Hour.“When we gave women the right to homestead and economic control of their livelihood, we saw women developing a level of independence that they may not have had in the Eastern part of the country,” said Haksgaard. “In that sense, it’s not terribly surprising that suffrage—the women’s right to vote—started first on the Western frontier.”A University of California-Berkeley School of Law graduate, Haksgaard was an editor on the Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law &amp; Justice. Following law school, Haksgaard clerked for the Honorable Roberto Lange of the District of South Dakota and the Honorable Kermit Bye of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Haksgaard joined the USD Knudson School of Law faculty in 2016.Credit Hour is the University of South Dakota’s podcast highlighting the achievement, research and scholarship of its staff, students, alumni and faculty. Follow Credit Hour on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and www.usd.edu/podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

USD Associate Professor of Law Hannah Haksgaard Discusses South Dakota’s Early Homestead Days on Credit HourVERMILLION, S.D. – University of South Dakota Associate Professor of Law Hannah Haksgaard discussed her career and research into South Dakota’s early homesteading days on USD's podcast, Credit Hour.“When we gave women the right to homestead and economic control of their livelihood, we saw women developing a level of independence that they may not have had in the Eastern part of the country,” said Haksgaard. “In that sense, it’s not terribly surprising that suffrage—the women’s right to vote—started first on the Western frontier.”A University of California-Berkeley School of Law graduate, Haksgaard was an editor on the Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law &amp; Justice. Following law school, Haksgaard clerked for the Honorable Roberto Lange of the District of South Dakota and the Honorable Kermit Bye of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Haksgaard joined the USD Knudson School of Law faculty in 2016.Credit Hour is the University of South Dakota’s podcast highlighting the achievement, research and scholarship of its staff, students, alumni and faculty. Follow Credit Hour on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and <a href="http://www.usd.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">www.usd.edu/podcast</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

HANNAH HAKSGAARD | Women Homesteading

In this episode, Hannah Haksgaard, Associate Professor of Law at the University of South Dakota School of Law, returns and discusses her article “Rural Practice as Public Interest Work,” published this summer in the symposium issue of the Maine Law Review. Prof. Hakgaard introduces listeners to the severe rural lawyer shortage faced in every state of the country. She then explains why rural private practice should be considered public interest work for the purposes of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program: 1) to combat the rural lawyer shortage, 2) the mixed nature of rural practice, 3) supplying public services, and 4) to combat low rural lawyer salaries. Prof. Haksgaard then addresses the implications of extending the definition of “public interest” to include rural private practice on federal student loan forgiveness and recruiting for law schools, particularly state law schools in rural communities. Her scholarship, including her new paper, is available on SSRN.This episode was hosted by Maybell Romero, Assistant Professor of Law at Northern Illinois University College of Law. Prof. Romero is on Twitter at @maybellromero. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="http://www.usd.edu/faculty-and-staff/Hannah-Haksgaard" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Hannah Haksgaard</a>, Associate Professor of Law at the University of South Dakota School of Law, returns and discusses her article “<a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3386710" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Rural Practice as Public Interest Work</a>,” published this summer in the symposium issue of the Maine Law Review. Prof. Hakgaard introduces listeners to the severe rural lawyer shortage faced in every state of the country. She then explains why rural private practice should be considered public interest work for the purposes of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program: 1) to combat the rural lawyer shortage, 2) the mixed nature of rural practice, 3) supplying public services, and 4) to combat low rural lawyer salaries. Prof. Haksgaard then addresses the implications of extending the definition of “public interest” to include rural private practice on federal student loan forgiveness and recruiting for law schools, particularly state law schools in rural communities. Her scholarship, including her new paper, is available on <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1871952" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SSRN</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="https://www.niu.edu/law/about/directory/romero.shtml" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Maybell Romero</a>, Assistant Professor of Law at Northern Illinois University College of Law. Prof. Romero is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/MaybellRomero" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@maybellromero</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Hannah Haksgaard on Rural Practice as Public Interest Work

In this episode, Hannah Haksgaard, Associate Professor of Law at the University of South Dakota School of Law, discusses her article “Blending Surnames at Marriage,” forthcoming in the Stanford Law and Policy Review. Prof. Hakgaard starts with her engaging personal story of creating a new, blended surname with her husband while relating some of the challenged that arose while attempting to do so initially in South Dakota, then finding success in North Dakota. She then gives a brief overview of the history of surname changes at marriage in the United States along with an overview of current legislation in New York, North Dakota, Kansas, and California allowing for blended surnames. Prof. Haksgaard then discusses her legislative proposal for those 46 states that do not explicitly acknowledge or allow for blended surnames, and reflects on why traditional, dual gendered understandings of surnames are outdated. She then addresses expected objections to her proposal, explaining why any fears of fraud and administrative confusion are unfounded. Prof. Haksgaard concludes by highlighting the benefit to states willing to adopt her proposal—avoiding constitutional challenge. Her scholarship, including her new paper, is available on SSRN.This episode was hosted by Maybell Romero Assistant Professor of Law at Northern Illinois University College of Law. Prof. Romero is on Twitter at @maybellromero. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this episode, <a href="http://www.usd.edu/faculty-and-staff/Hannah-Haksgaard" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Hannah Haksgaard</a>, Associate Professor of Law at the University of South Dakota School of Law, discusses her article “<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3408884" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Blending Surnames at Marriage</a>,” forthcoming in the Stanford Law and Policy Review. Prof. Hakgaard starts with her engaging personal story of creating a new, blended surname with her husband while relating some of the challenged that arose while attempting to do so initially in South Dakota, then finding success in North Dakota. She then gives a brief overview of the history of surname changes at marriage in the United States along with an overview of current legislation in New York, North Dakota, Kansas, and California allowing for blended surnames. Prof. Haksgaard then discusses her legislative proposal for those 46 states that do not explicitly acknowledge or allow for blended surnames, and reflects on why traditional, dual gendered understandings of surnames are outdated. She then addresses expected objections to her proposal, explaining why any fears of fraud and administrative confusion are unfounded. Prof. Haksgaard concludes by highlighting the benefit to states willing to adopt her proposal—avoiding constitutional challenge. Her scholarship, including her new paper, is available on <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1871952" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SSRN</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="https://www.niu.edu/law/about/directory/romero.shtml" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Maybell Romero</a> Assistant Professor of Law at Northern Illinois University College of Law. Prof. Romero is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/MaybellRomero" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@maybellromero</a>. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for privacy and opt-out information.