Dan Epps's guest appearances

Dan Epps

Ipse Dixit

Passing Judgment

Elon Musk

John Newman

Kamala Harris

Bill Barr

Donald Trump

Tim Schneider

Eric Goldman

Carrie Goldberg

Lawrence Lessig

Nicholas Bagley

Heidi Matthews

Leigh Goodmark

Todd Zywicki

Simon Tam

Greg Shill

OwlTail

Jessica talks with Dan Epps of Washington University about the current state of the court and the pros and cons of proposed reforms.  This episode was recorded during a panel of Loyola Law School's Journalist Law School program.  This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

Jessica talks with Dan Epps of Washington University about the current state of the court and the pros and cons of proposed reforms. This episode was recorded during a panel of Loyola Law School's Journalist Law School program. This podcast is powered by <a href="https://pinecast.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Pinecast</a>.

Is the Supreme Court doomed? (Guest - Prof. Dan Epps) 

In this episode, Daniel Epps, Associate Professor of Law at Washington University St. Louis School of Law, discusses his draft article "Checks and Balances in the Criminal Law." Epps begins by observing that we often conflate the separation of powers with checks and balances, and arguing that they are actually quite different. He notes that many scholars and judges consider the separation of powers critical to restraining the exercise of criminal law, but he argues that checks and balances actually do the real work. He observes that separation of powers turned out to really be separation of parties. And he argues that we should focus on imposing limits, rather than distributing powers. Epps is on Twitter at @danepps.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Epps" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Daniel Epps</a>, <a href="https://law.wustl.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/daniel-epps/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Associate Professor of Law at Washington University St. Louis School of Law</a>, discusses his draft article "Checks and Balances in the Criminal Law." Epps begins by observing that we often conflate the separation of powers with checks and balances, and arguing that they are actually quite different. He notes that many scholars and judges consider the separation of powers critical to restraining the exercise of criminal law, but he argues that checks and balances actually do the real work. He observes that separation of powers turned out to really be separation of parties. And he argues that we should focus on imposing limits, rather than distributing powers. Epps is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/danepps" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@danepps</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@brianlfrye</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Dan Epps on Checks and Balances in Criminal Law