Dustin Marlan's guest appearances

Dustin Marlan

Ipse Dixit

John Newman

Tim Schneider

Eric Goldman

Carrie Goldberg

Lawrence Lessig

Nicholas Bagley

Heidi Matthews

Leigh Goodmark

Todd Zywicki

Simon Tam

Greg Shill

Adam Winkler

Patrick O'Donnell

David Ley

Ben Carter

OwlTail

In this episode, Mason Marks, Assistant Professor at Gonzaga University School of Law and Edmond J. Safra/Petrie-Flom Center Joint Fellow-in-Residence at Harvard University, and Dustin Marlan, Assistant Professor at University of Massachusetts College of Law Dartmouth, discuss their work on the regulation and use of psychedelics. Marks's scholarship is available here, and Marlan's scholarship is available here. They begin by explaining what psychedelics are and their emerging medical uses. They reflect on the strict regulation of psychedelics, and how it limits research into medical uses, as well as infringing on civil liberties. Marks in Twitter at @MasonMarksMD and Marlan is at @DustinMarlan.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://www.gonzaga.edu/school-of-law/regular-faculty/detail/marksm" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Mason Marks</a>, Assistant Professor at Gonzaga University School of Law and Edmond J. Safra/Petrie-Flom Center Joint Fellow-in-Residence at Harvard University, and <a href="https://www.umassd.edu/directory/dmarlan/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Dustin Marlan</a>, Assistant Professor at University of Massachusetts College of Law Dartmouth, discuss their work on the regulation and use of psychedelics. Marks's scholarship is available <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3607702" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">here</a>, and Marlan's scholarship is available <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3438542" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">here</a>. They begin by explaining what psychedelics are and their emerging medical uses. They reflect on the strict regulation of psychedelics, and how it limits research into medical uses, as well as infringing on civil liberties. Marks in Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/MasonMarksMD" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">@MasonMarksMD</a> and Marlan is at <a href="https://twitter.com/DustinMarlan" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">@DustinMarlan</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">@brianlfrye</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Mason Marks & Dustin Marlan on the Regulation & Use of Psychedelics

In this episode, Dustin Marlan, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Massachusetts School of Law, discusses his draft article "Unmasking the Right of Publicity." Marlan describes the creation of the right of publicity by Judge Frank in Haelan v. Topps (1953), and the confusion that has long surrounded the justification for the right of publicity. He argues that Frank was influenced by the psychoanalytic theories of Freud and Jung, in particular the concept of the "divided self," consisting of a "true" inner self and a "false" outer self. Marlan observes that modern theories of the "intersubjective" self suggest that Frank's model may need to be revisited.Keywords: right of publicity, psychoanalysis, Judge Jerome Frank, Jung, Freud, intersubjectivity, advertising, new media, social media, legal realism, persona, personality, Haelan Laboratories, self, identity Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://www.umassd.edu/directory/dmarlan/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dustin Marlan</a>, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Massachusetts School of Law, discusses his draft article "<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3300959" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Unmasking the Right of Publicity</a>." Marlan describes the creation of the right of publicity by Judge Frank in Haelan v. Topps (1953), and the confusion that has long surrounded the justification for the right of publicity. He argues that Frank was influenced by the psychoanalytic theories of Freud and Jung, in particular the concept of the "divided self," consisting of a "true" inner self and a "false" outer self. Marlan observes that modern theories of the "intersubjective" self suggest that Frank's model may need to be revisited.Keywords: right of publicity, psychoanalysis, Judge Jerome Frank, Jung, Freud, intersubjectivity, advertising, new media, social media, legal realism, persona, personality, Haelan Laboratories, self, identity Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Dustin Marlan on Psychoanalysis & the Right of Publicity