Cover image of Finnegan IP Law Podcast Series
(8)
Business

Finnegan IP Law Podcast Series

Updated 2 days ago

Business
Read more

Finnegan is one of the largest intellectual property law firms in the world. The Finnegan podcast series covers highlights from the firm and latest developments in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation.

Read more

Finnegan is one of the largest intellectual property law firms in the world. The Finnegan podcast series covers highlights from the firm and latest developments in patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation.

iTunes Ratings

8 Ratings
Average Ratings
5
1
0
1
1

Good, Accessible Content on Patent Law

By Mms 23451 - Feb 19 2014
Read more
There are not many podcasts on patent law. This one provides good content, without getting into the weeds.

Can't get episodes

By Podcast Joe - Jan 12 2013
Read more
I subscribed, but the episodes are not showing. There is something wrong with this podcast.

iTunes Ratings

8 Ratings
Average Ratings
5
1
0
1
1

Good, Accessible Content on Patent Law

By Mms 23451 - Feb 19 2014
Read more
There are not many podcasts on patent law. This one provides good content, without getting into the weeds.

Can't get episodes

By Podcast Joe - Jan 12 2013
Read more
I subscribed, but the episodes are not showing. There is something wrong with this podcast.
Cover image of Finnegan IP Law Podcast Series

Finnegan IP Law Podcast Series

Latest release on Dec 31, 2019

The Best Episodes Ranked Using User Listens

Updated by OwlTail 2 days ago

Rank #1: Mark Sommers Discusses the Southern District of New York's Decision to Grant Broad Injunctive Relief to Tory Burch and Future Implications to Fashion Counterfeiters

Podcast cover
Read more
The fashion industry continues to face a surge in sophisticated criminal counterfeiting operations–many are aggressive in their online efforts to market and sell luxury brand knockoffs. A recent court decision in the Southern District of New York granted broad injunctive relief to luxury brand retailer Tory Burch, who had filed suit after discovering more than 200 different websites selling counterfeit versions of its signature products. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Mark Sommers discusses the recent court decision, and the precedent it upholds in imposing measures against the next-generation methods and techniques counterfeiters are using to dodge liability.

Oct 28 2011

8mins

Play

Rank #2: Jeffrey Totten on the Upcoming Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Discovery Scope and Document Production

Podcast cover
Read more
Several changes to the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that may impact patent litigation are set to take effect on December 1, 2015. In particular, the amended rules will affect the scope of discovery and document requests. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Jeffrey C. Totten discusses these scheduled rule changes.

Oct 20 2015

5mins

Play

Rank #3: Bill Lewris on the Patent Dance

Podcast cover
Read more
In June, the Supreme Court announced its decisions in Sandoz v. Amgen and Amgen v. Sandoz – cases that examined how makers of biosimilars and branded biologic drugs bring products to market. At issue was the so-called “patent dance,” a complex series of disclosures between biosimilar makers and the manufacturers of branded versions. In its decision, the Court left it up to states to decide whether to enforce the patent dance and how. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Bill Lewris discusses implications of the decision.

Sep 26 2017

18mins

Play

Rank #4: Susan Tull on Patenting the Future of Medicine

Podcast cover
Read more
Artificial intelligence, or AI, is rapidly transforming the world of medicine. AI computers are diagnosing medical conditions at a rate equal to or better than humans, all while developing their own code and algorithms to do so. With the rise of AI, there are new issues of patentability, inventorship, and ownership that must be addressed. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Susan Tull discusses current issues surrounding intellectual property and AI in medicine.

Jan 08 2018

7mins

Play

Rank #5: Mike Jakes on Why the Supreme Court Should Agree to Hear the Bilski Case

Podcast cover
Read more
Finnegan partner Mike Jakes analyzes the Federal Circuit's decision in the Bilski case, and discusses why the Supreme court should hear the case.

Jan 28 2009

8mins

Play

Rank #6: Eric Raciti on Patent Landscapes: Early-Stage Companies

Podcast cover
Read more
Today’s changing IP landscape is unprecedented. Stakeholders have a growing array of global tools that bring enormous opportunities, but also challenge traditional portfolio management and enforcement strategies. In part two of a three-part podcast series on patent landscapes, Finnegan attorney Eric P. Raciti discusses key considerations for early-stage companies, including some of the pitfalls a startup should be aware of when performing a patent landscape.

Nov 03 2014

8mins

Play

Rank #7: Robert Yoches on Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp. and Business Method Patents

Podcast cover
Read more
Finnegan partner Robert Yoches takes a closer look at the Federal Circuit's reversal of the District Court's decision in Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corporation and I-Deal, LLC.

Sep 09 2008

8mins

Play

Rank #8: False Advertising and the ITC

Podcast cover
Read more
False advertising claims have changed over the course of recent decades as the means by which companies can advertise have evolved. Additionally, how and where false advertising cases are tried has also changed over time. In recent years, more cases are being heard by the International Trade Commission (ITC). In this podcast, Finnegan partners Mareesa Frederick and Naresh Kilaru share their insights on these developments.

Apr 10 2019

12mins

Play

Rank #9: Erika Arner and Barbara Rudolph Review and Preview U.S. Supreme Court Patent Cases in 2013

Podcast cover
Read more
From Bilski v. Kappos, to Mayo v. Prometheus, to Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, high-profile patent cases have become a regular feature of recent sessions of the U.S. Supreme Court. In the current Supreme Court session we’ll see a continuation of this trend. Finnegan partners Erika Arner and Barbara Rudolph discuss the growing presence of intellectual property cases before the Court.

Oct 15 2013

8mins

Play

Rank #10: SaMD Series: What Should Tech Companies Know?

Podcast cover
Read more
Software as a Medical Device – also referred to as SaMD – is one of the fastest growing innovations in the medical device industry. As with any technology that experiences rapid adoption, challenges related to intellectual property protection often follow. In this series, we take a close look at IP considerations that SaMD developers should be aware of as they enter this market. In this podcast, Finnegan attorneys Susan Tull and Cory Bell explore challenges tech companies may face when developing SaMD.

Jul 17 2018

10mins

Play

Rank #11: December 2018 - Last Month at the Federal Circuit Podcast Series

Podcast cover
Read more
Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit impacting the intellectual property community. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Mike Jakes reviews recent developments at the Federal Circuit regarding patent eligibility under Section 101, including the recent Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc. case.

Dec 19 2018

18mins

Play

Rank #12: Naresh Kilaru Discusses Trade Secret, Trade Dress, and Trademark Lessons from Fuhu v. Toys “R” Us

Podcast cover
Read more
A recent suit by electronics maker Fuhu, Inc. against Toys “R” Us over the two companies’ plans to market tablet computers for children provides a window into multiple aspects of current intellectual property law. Fuhu’s claims span trade secrets, trade dress, and trademark issues, and provide a recent example helping illustrate current trends in the respective case law. Finnegan attorney Naresh Kilaru discusses the case and the lessons that other companies can take from it.

Mar 15 2013

7mins

Play

Rank #13: Erika Arner and Mark Sweet Take a Retrospective Look at the AIA Provisions

Podcast cover
Read more
It has been a year since the final provisions of the America Invents Act took effect in March of 2013. Finnegan partners Erika Arner and Mark Sweet provide some observations on the AIA implementation one year in. They discuss the first-inventor-to-file provision, trends in invention capture, the expansion of prior art, track one examinations, post-grant review proceedings at the PTAB, and impacts on district court patent litigation.

Mar 17 2014

12mins

Play

Rank #14: Smith Brittingham and Mareesa Frederick on Best Practices for Litigating at the ITC

Podcast cover
Read more
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has become a key destination for both domestic and foreign intellectual property litigants. ITC cases go to trial faster than almost any forum in the world. This presents litigants with attractive benefits, but can also pose unique challenges. Finnegan attorneys Smith Brittingham and Mareesa Frederick discuss best practices to be prepared to litigate at the ITC.

Apr 18 2013

10mins

Play

Rank #15: Josh Goldberg, Cory Bell, and Kevin Rodkey on the Supreme Court's Decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu

Podcast cover
Read more
In SAS Institute v. Iancu, the Supreme Court addressed the question of “[w]hen the Patent Office initiates an inter partes review, must it resolve all of the claims in the case, or may it choose to limit its review to only some of them?” The Court found that, contrary to the prior USPTO practice, the Board may not limit institution to only some of the challenged claims. Finnegan attorneys Joshua Goldberg, Kevin Rodkey, and Cory Bell join us now to discuss what happens now.

May 02 2018

11mins

Play

Rank #16: Winter Olympic Trademarks

Podcast cover
Read more
With the Winter Olympics here, many businesses are looking for ways to incorporate messaging related to the games into marketing, advertising and social media campaigns. However, the Olympics have very strict–and sometimes confusing–rules related to what companies can and can’t say. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Danny Awdeh offers insight into this timely topic.

Feb 08 2018

9mins

Play

Rank #17: Linda Thayer on Tafas v. Doll - An Update: Federal Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc

Podcast cover
Read more
Finnegan partner Linda Thayer provides an update on Tafas v. Doll as the Federal Circuit grants rehearing en banc.

Jul 17 2009

6mins

Play

Rank #18: SaMD Series: The Interplay Between IP and FDA Submissions

Podcast cover
Read more
Software as a Medical Device – also referred to as SaMD – is one of the fastest growing innovations in the medical device industry. As with any technology that experiences rapid adoption, challenges related to intellectual property protection often follow. In this series, we take a close look at IP considerations that SaMD developers should be aware of as they enter this market. In this podcast, Finnegan partners Shana Cyr and Susan Tull explore the interplay between intellectual property and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) submissions for SaMD.

Jul 30 2018

10mins

Play

Rank #19: November 2018 - Last Month at the Federal Circuit Podcast Series

Podcast cover
Read more
Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit impacting the intellectual property community. In this podcast, Finnegan partner Dori Hines offers insight into three recently-decided cases—Arista v. Cisco, GoPro v. Countour IP Holdings, and Acceleration Bay v. Electronic Arts—all of which were appeals from the PTAB.all of which were appeals from the PTAB.

Nov 16 2018

18mins

Play

Rank #20: Jeffrey Totten and Jason Stach on the Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Electronically Stored Information

Podcast cover
Read more
New amendments to the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect on December 1, 2015 and the amendments impact several areas of patent litigation. In part two of this series, Finnegan attorneys Jeffrey C. Totten and Jason E. Stach discuss changes to Rule 37(e), which imposes new sanctions for the loss of electronically stored information.

Dec 15 2015

9mins

Play