Cover image of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
(288)

Rank #17 in Government category

Government

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Updated 3 days ago

Rank #17 in Government category

Government
Read more

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

Read more

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

iTunes Ratings

288 Ratings
Average Ratings
261
13
9
2
3

Supreme Broadcast

By Captainbinkman - Apr 12 2018
Read more
Easiest way to listen to the oral arguments of the Supreme Court. 👍🏼

Granted I’m a nerd...

By cjmooney - Jan 14 2018
Read more
...but the machinations of these arguments are fascinating

iTunes Ratings

288 Ratings
Average Ratings
261
13
9
2
3

Supreme Broadcast

By Captainbinkman - Apr 12 2018
Read more
Easiest way to listen to the oral arguments of the Supreme Court. 👍🏼

Granted I’m a nerd...

By cjmooney - Jan 14 2018
Read more
...but the machinations of these arguments are fascinating
Cover image of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Latest release on Jan 15, 2020

Read more

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

Rank #1: McKinney v. Arizona

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the Arizona Supreme Court was required to apply current law, rather than the law as it existed at the time a defendant’s conviction became final, when weighing mitigating and aggravating evidence to determine whether a death sentence is warranted; and (2) whether the correction of error under Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982), requires resentencing.

Dec 11 2019

59mins

Play

Rank #2: Flowers v. Mississippi

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that the trial court in this case committed clear error at Flowers’ sixth murder trial by concluding that the state’s peremptory strike of a particular black prospective juror was not motivated in substantial part by discriminatory intent.

Mar 20 2019

54mins

Play

Rank #3: The American Legion v. American Humanist Association

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that the display and maintenance of a large memorial cross by a local government does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Feb 27 2019

1hr 13mins

Play

Rank #4: Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that a government violates the Takings Clause when it takes property without compensation, and a property owner may bring a Fifth Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 at that time; the state-litigation requirement set forth in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), is overruled.

Jan 16 2019

1hr 3mins

Play

Rank #5: Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful.

Nov 12 2019

1hr 22mins

Play

Rank #6: Rucho v. Common Cause

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.

Mar 26 2019

1hr 11mins

Play

Rank #7: Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that a state’s regulation of liquor sales by granting licenses only to individuals or entities that have resided in-state for a specified time violates the dormant Commerce Clause and is not saved by the Twenty-First Amendment.

Jan 16 2019

51mins

Play

Rank #8: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether New York City’s ban on transporting a licensed, locked, and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits is consistent with the Second Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the constitutional right to travel.

Dec 02 2019

1hr 2mins

Play

Rank #9: Kisor v. Wilkie

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 (1945), which direct courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation, are not overruled.

Mar 27 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Rank #10: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination against transgender employees based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).

Oct 08 2019

57mins

Play

Rank #11: Hernandez v. Mesa

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether, when plaintiffs plausibly allege that a rogue federal law enforcement officer violated clearly established Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights for which there is no alternative legal remedy, the federal courts can and should recognize a claim of damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Nov 12 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Rank #12: Bostock v. Clayton County

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits against employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” encompasses discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation.

Oct 08 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Rank #13: Department of Commerce v. New York

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that the Secretary of Commerce did not violate the Enumeration Clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the Secretary’s explanation for his decision.

Apr 23 2019

1hr 22mins

Play

Rank #14: Monasky v. Taglieri

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) the proper standard of review of a district court’s determination of habitual residence under the Hague Convention—de novo, a deferential version of de novo, or for clear error; and (2) whether, when an infant is too young to acclimate to her surroundings, a subjective agreement between the infant‘s parents is necessary to establish her habitual residence under the Hague Convention.

Dec 11 2019

1hr

Play

Rank #15: Maine Community Health Options v. United States

Podcast cover
Read more
Several cases in which the Court will decide whether an appropriations rider whose text bars the agency’s use of certain funds to pay a statutory obligation, but does not repeal or amend the statutory obligation, does in fact impliedly repeal the obligation, and whether the presumption against retroactivity applies to the interpretation of such an appropriations rider.

Dec 10 2019

1hr

Play

Rank #16: Kansas v. Garcia

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) expressly preempts states from using information provided on a federal Form I-9 in a prosecution of any person when the same information also appears in non-IRCA documents; and (2) whether the Act impliedly preempts Kansas’s prosecution of the respondents in this case.

Oct 16 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Rank #17: Quarles v. United States

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that Michigan’s third-degree home-invasion statute substantially corresponds to or is narrower than generic burglary for purposes of qualifying for enhanced sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act.

Apr 24 2019

55mins

Play

Rank #18: County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source, such as groundwater.

Nov 06 2019

1hr 2mins

Play

Rank #19: Mitchell v. Wisconsin

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court vacated the judgment of the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirming the drunk-driving convictions of petitioner Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious, and remanded the case.

Apr 23 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Rank #20: Taggart v. Lorenzen

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that a creditor may be held in civil contempt for violating a bankruptcy court’s discharge order if there is no fair ground of doubt as to whether the order barred the creditor’s conduct.

Apr 24 2019

54mins

Play

Babb v. Wilkie

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether a provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) that protects federal employees aged 40 years from age discrimination, 29 U.S.C. § 633a(a), requires a plaintiff to prove that age was a but-for cause of the challenged personnel action.

Jan 15 2020

59mins

Play

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether, under Section 35 of the Lanham Act, willful infringement is a prerequisite for an award of an infringer’s profits for a violation of Section 43(a).

Jan 14 2020

57mins

Play

Kelly v. United States

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether a public official “defraud[s]” the government of its property by advancing a “public policy reason” for an official decision that is not her subjective “real reason” for making the decision.

Jan 14 2020

1hr

Play

Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group Inc.

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether, when a plaintiff asserts new claims, federal preclusion principles can bar a defendant from raising defenses that were not actually litigated and resolved in any prior case between the parties.

Jan 13 2020

1hr 1min

Play

Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether an ERISA plan participant may seek injunctive relief or restoration of plan losses caused by fiduciary breach without demonstrating individual financial loss or the imminent risk thereof.

Jan 13 2020

1hr 2mins

Play

McKinney v. Arizona

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the Arizona Supreme Court was required to apply current law, rather than the law as it existed at the time a defendant’s conviction became final, when weighing mitigating and aggravating evidence to determine whether a death sentence is warranted; and (2) whether the correction of error under Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982), requires resentencing.

Dec 11 2019

59mins

Play

Monasky v. Taglieri

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) the proper standard of review of a district court’s determination of habitual residence under the Hague Convention—de novo, a deferential version of de novo, or for clear error; and (2) whether, when an infant is too young to acclimate to her surroundings, a subjective agreement between the infant‘s parents is necessary to establish her habitual residence under the Hague Convention.

Dec 11 2019

1hr

Play

Maine Community Health Options v. United States

Podcast cover
Read more
Several cases in which the Court will decide whether an appropriations rider whose text bars the agency’s use of certain funds to pay a statutory obligation, but does not repeal or amend the statutory obligation, does in fact impliedly repeal the obligation, and whether the presumption against retroactivity applies to the interpretation of such an appropriations rider.

Dec 10 2019

1hr

Play

Holguin-Hernandez v. United States

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether a criminal defendant must make a formal objection after the pronouncement of the sentence to invoke appellate reasonableness review of the length of the sentence.

Dec 10 2019

47mins

Play

Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether a request for equitable tolling, as it applies to statutory motions to reopen, is judicially reviewable as a “question of law” or instead is unreviewable as a “question of fact.”

Dec 09 2019

58mins

Play

Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) permits appeal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to institute an inter partes review upon finding that 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)’s time bar did not apply.

Dec 09 2019

1hr 2mins

Play

Banister v. Davis

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether and under what circumstances a timely Rule 59(e) motion to “amend or alter” the court’s judgment should be recharacterized as a second or successive habeas petition under Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524 (2005).

Dec 04 2019

58mins

Play

Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether the three-year limitations period in Section 413(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1113(2)—which runs from “the earliest date on which the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the breach or violation”—bars suit if the defendants disclosed to the plaintiff all relevant information more than three years before the plaintiff filed the complaint, but the plaintiff chose not to read or could not recall having read the information.

Dec 04 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian, et al.

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide: (1) whether a common-law claim for restoration seeking cleanup remedies that conflict with remedies the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ordered is a jurisdictionally barred “challenge” to the EPA’s cleanup under 42 U.S.C. § 9613 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA); (2) whether a landowner at a Superfund site is a “potentially responsible party” that must seek EPA approval under 42 U.S.C. § 9622(e)(6) of CERCLA before engaging in remedial action, even if the EPA has never ordered the landowner to pay for a cleanup; and (3) whether CERCLA preempts state common-law claims for restoration that seek cleanup remedies that conflict with EPA-ordered remedies.

Dec 03 2019

1hr 1min

Play

Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether federal common law or the law of the relevant state determines the ownership of a tax refund paid to an affiliated group.

Dec 03 2019

59mins

Play

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether New York City’s ban on transporting a licensed, locked, and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits is consistent with the Second Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the constitutional right to travel.

Dec 02 2019

1hr 2mins

Play

Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc.

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether the government edict doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated.

Dec 02 2019

1hr

Play

Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court held that a bankruptcy court’s order unreservedly denying relief from the automatic stay of creditor debt-collection efforts outside the bankruptcy forum is final and immediately appealable.

Nov 13 2019

1hr 2mins

Play

Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide whether a claim of race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a showing of but-for causation or only that race is a motivating factor.

Nov 13 2019

59mins

Play

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California

Podcast cover
Read more
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful.

Nov 12 2019

1hr 22mins

Play

iTunes Ratings

288 Ratings
Average Ratings
261
13
9
2
3

Supreme Broadcast

By Captainbinkman - Apr 12 2018
Read more
Easiest way to listen to the oral arguments of the Supreme Court. 👍🏼

Granted I’m a nerd...

By cjmooney - Jan 14 2018
Read more
...but the machinations of these arguments are fascinating