Cover image of Better Patents Now
(2)
Business

Better Patents Now

Updated 9 days ago

Business
Read more

Discussions about the best ways to utilize patent data from two patent attorneys who spend their days looking at patent data

Read more

Discussions about the best ways to utilize patent data from two patent attorneys who spend their days looking at patent data

iTunes Ratings

2 Ratings
Average Ratings
1
0
1
0
0

Brilliant, practical, and friendly!

By J Rynkö - May 22 2017
Read more
Chris and Megan are obviously brilliant attorneys and patent law experts, but their likable, fun vibe is what sets this podcast apart.

iTunes Ratings

2 Ratings
Average Ratings
1
0
1
0
0

Brilliant, practical, and friendly!

By J Rynkö - May 22 2017
Read more
Chris and Megan are obviously brilliant attorneys and patent law experts, but their likable, fun vibe is what sets this podcast apart.
Cover image of Better Patents Now

Better Patents Now

Latest release on Feb 04, 2019

The Best Episodes Ranked Using User Listens

Updated by OwlTail 9 days ago

Rank #1: #25 Former USPTO Patent Examiner Shares His Advice for Patent Practitioners

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan interview patent attorney Ryan Schneer about his experience as a patent examiner. Ryan discusses some of the benefits and challenges of working in a newly formed art unit and shares valuable insights into the organizational hierarchy at the USPTO. Based on his experience working on both sides of the table, Ryan shares his advice for patent practitioners.

Oct 16 2017

23mins

Play

Rank #2: #38: Analytics Behind "Stupid Patent of the Month" Blog

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan dive into the prosecution histories of several patents featured on the "Stupid Patent of the Month" blog. The blog was created before Alice to shine the spotlight on (arguably) overbroad software patents, but even after Alice the authors have continued to uncover issuances with broad or seemingly obvious claims. An analysis of the last 20 patents featured in the blog indicates that these applications may have gotten through the USPTO by avoiding the Alice-heavy - or "doom" - art units.

Apr 30 2018

22mins

Play

Rank #3: #40: Top 5 Audibles in Patent Prosecution

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan pinpoint 5 prosecution scenarios where a strategy change may be necessary in light of the statistics. Like football, prosecution is a back-and-forth between the examiner and the applicant that requires constant reevaluation. For example, even when appeal may seem like the most favorable route substantively – or instinctively – if the statistics are not in your favor, it may make sense to continue working with the examiner.

May 14 2018

20mins

Play

Rank #4: #46 Troubled Patents: Should We Get Aggressive or Give Up?

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris shares an experience from an Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) Regional Conference where he sat on a panel representing the perspectives of a client, attorney, patent office and analytics. Each panelist shared from their point of view the dilemma of one specific case and the approach that they would take in dealing with a troubled patent application. When is it time to use the appeal process or take some other extraordinary action after a final rejection has been issued? Chris discusses the key role of patent analytics in moving you from a position of guessing your next step to one of data-informed prosecution strategy.

Jul 30 2018

21mins

Play

Rank #5: #47 Patent Analytics: Table Stakes for Law Firms

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris interviews Ken Gemmill, Business Operations Manager for LexisNexis IP. In his career, Ken has witnessed the birth of analytics entering the patent business. He routinely speaks with law firms that are using analytics in their patent prosecution. Chris and Ken discuss the ways that the field has evolved, and how today's law firms can use patent analytics to their advantage, beyond examiner reports.

Aug 06 2018

19mins

Play

Rank #6: #28 Top 5 Decisions That Require Patent Data Context

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan identify five specific decisions that patent prosecution attorneys should typically never make without being informed by relevant data. The emphasis is on anticipating a most likely outcome instead of guessing. 

Nov 06 2017

19mins

Play

Rank #7: #16 Where do Litigated Patents Come From?

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan interview guest speaker Professor Sean Tu, from the University of West Virginia, about his research on which examiners are most likely to issue litigated patents. Are these controversial patents mainly issued by junior or primary examiners - or both? His surprising findings raise questions about USPTO promotion practices.

Aug 14 2017

22mins

Play

Rank #8: #23 Patent Examiner Gameplay

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan discuss a common strategy patent examiners use, but which may cost applicants unnecessary prosecution dollars. Specifically, many examiners have a habit of requiring an RCE prior to granting an allowance, even when the amendment after final was not significant. Is there really a need for the additional fee and the additional search? What should applicants do when working with examiners who have this tendency?

Oct 02 2017

19mins

Play

Rank #9: #42: Prosecution Patterns with Professor Tu

Podcast cover
Read more

Professor Sean Tu returns to talk to Chris and Megan about his research into what drives examiner behavioral patterns. His previous research revealed pockets of fast-moving and slow-moving examiners, but now he aims to answer the question "how are applicants and examiners slowing the prosecution process"? To answer this question, Professor Tu has conducted an in-depth, manual analysis of hundreds of applications from technology center 1600. In this episode, he shares the initial results of this analysis, including what types of rejections slower examiners typically issue, how many rejections they issue, and whether their applications are mostly original filings or continuations.

May 29 2018

26mins

Play

Rank #10: #17 GoPro Gets Lucky

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan discuss the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 6,955,484, GoPro's patent covering their basic technology. The examiner who allowed that patent has a history of indicating "allowable subject matter" early in prosecution. Did GoPro make the right strategic decisions based on this examiner's history of permissiveness?

Aug 21 2017

19mins

Play

Rank #11: #19 Monsanto's Wise Choice

Podcast cover
Read more

Megan and Chris evaluate the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 5,352,605, Monsanto’s patent on genetically modified soybeans that was at issue in Bowman v. Monsanto. Monsanto’s counsel for this patent application took a very aggressive prosecution strategy—appealing after the first final office action—and it paid off. In what other situations could such an aggressive appeal strategy make statistical sense?

Sep 05 2017

21mins

Play

Rank #12: #18 Under the Microscope: Evaluating Chris

Podcast cover
Read more

Megan decides whether she would hire Chris as her patent attorney, based on his prosecution performance. Megan and Chris evaluate his allowance rate, office action, interview, and appeal statistics.

Aug 28 2017

21mins

Play

Rank #13: 44: Can I Please Get A New Patent Examiner?

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan discuss the challenges of getting a new examiner by filing a continuation application. In spite of the difficulties, this strategy has worked for some attorneys with the right tools—including LexisNexis PathWays™. PathWays predicts which group of examiners an application will be assigned to, and helps guide users toward more favorable assignments. Using this tool, Chris and Megan work through the ideation process for an example continuation filing aimed at getting a different examiner.

Jun 18 2018

24mins

Play

Rank #14: #52: Inside Scoop with Former Patent Examiner Joshua Rudawitz

Podcast cover
Read more

Megan interviews patent attorney Josh Rudawitz about his experience as a patent examiner. Josh discusses his career path at the USPTO and shares valuable insights about the level of autonomy granted to examiners at various points in their careers. Based on his experience working on both sides of the table, Josh shares his advice for patent practitioners.

Oct 29 2018

21mins

Play

Rank #15: #3 Reinstate Appeal? Yes You Can!

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan decide whether to reinstate appeal in U.S. Application No. 12/173,281.

Apr 17 2017

21mins

Play

Rank #16: #12 The Mooters

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan discuss strategies for cases facing a "mooter": a patent examiner who repeatedly cites new art. In particular, they examine US Application No. 12/995,610 to determine whether there were early signs that appeal was a good strategy.

Jul 14 2017

16mins

Play

Rank #17: #6 The Top Six Attributes of a Good Patent Attorney

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan explore what makes a good patent attorney in today's world of big data.

Apr 17 2017

18mins

Play

Rank #18: #27 Back to Basics with Attorney Joe Kelly

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan interview Joe Kelly, of Kelly, Holt & Christenson, about basic response writing techniques for optimizing the likelihood of a desirable outcome during patent prosecution. Joe also explains his "multiple paths to allowance" amendment strategy.

Oct 30 2017

23mins

Play

Rank #19: #13 The Basics of the Patent Prosecution Process: Part One

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan review the basics of the patent prosecution process - from filing to issuance of a non-final office action - and give basic pointers on where patent analytics come into play.

Jul 24 2017

23mins

Play

Rank #20: #24 Using Patent Prosecution Analytics for Competitive Intelligence

Podcast cover
Read more

Chris and Megan relay their top 4 strategies for using prosecution analytics for competitive intelligence. While many competitive intelligence efforts are focused on a competitor’s issued patent portfolio, looking at prosecution statistics can provide insight into what is coming down the pipeline, as well as early indicators of an issued patent’s value. For example, you can identify pending applications likely to be of value to your competitors by monitoring for their Track One filings. 

Oct 09 2017

17mins

Play