OwlTail

Cover image of Janus v. AFSCME

Janus v. AFSCME Podcasts

Read more

11 of The Best Podcast Episodes for Janus v. AFSCME. A collection of podcasts episodes with or about Janus v. AFSCME, often where they are interviewed.

Read more

11 of The Best Podcast Episodes for Janus v. AFSCME. A collection of podcasts episodes with or about Janus v. AFSCME, often where they are interviewed.

Updated daily with the latest episodes

Episode artwork

Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) are joined by special guest Sam Bagenstos, professor at the University of Michigan Law School, to discuss a case that made it harder for unions to collect fees.

Please support our sponsors: 

Raycon -- buyraycon.com/fivefour

Spotify

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Jun 30 2020 · 43mins
Episode artwork

The Law episode 53: Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more

In the 2018 case, Janus v. AFSCME, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned one of its earlier decisions, the 1977 case, Abood v. Detroit Board of Ed. The 1977 Abood decision held that unions could deduct “agency fees” from union non-members without their consent. The Court in Janus, in a 5-4 decision, ended that practice as an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment. 

The post The Law episode 53: Janus v. AFSCME appeared first on Speakeasy Ideas.

Oct 03 2019 · 31mins

Similar People

Hernandez v. Mesa

JB Pritzker

Labor Day

Amy Coney

Richard Epstein

Covington Catholic

Allen v. Cooper

v. Lewis

Anne Burke

Elon Musk

Voter Registration

Peter Greer

Nick Franklin

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Scott McVay

Episode artwork

Lawyers With Two Organizations Involved in Janus v. AFSCME Case Discuss its Implications pt. 2

Play
Read more
Jeffrey Schwab is a Mauck & Baker alum and Senior Attorney at Liberty Justice Center, where he litigates cases to protect the rights to free speech, economic liberty, private property, and other Constitutional rights in both federal and state courts in Illinois. Liberty Justice Center is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public-interest litigation center that seeks to ensure that the rights to earn a living and start a business are available to all and fights to protect other fundamental rights in Illinois and beyond.

Amanda Freeman is a Mauck & Baker alum and current staff attorney at National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. National Right to Work is a nonprofit charitable organization with a mission to eliminate coercive union power and compulsory unionism abuses through strategic litigation, public information, and education programs. They advocate that every individual must have the right, but must not be compelled, to join a labor union.
Nov 29 2018 · 23mins
Episode artwork

The Legal Battle to Enforce Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more
In June 2018, the Supreme Court in Janus v. AFSCME held it unconstitutional under the First Amendment for the government to compel public employees to pay union dues or fees without their prior consent. This triggered a wave of litigation to enforce the seminal decision and eliminate state and union resistance to it. Among other things, there are cases pending that seek to recover union fees unlawfully seized from employees in the past, as well as cases that seek to strike down restrictions on when employees can exercise their Janus rights in the future. These and other cases, and the issues at stake in post-Janus litigation, will be surveyed by the attorney who briefed and argued Janus in the Supreme Court.
Featuring:
William L. Messenger, Staff Attorney, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
Nov 28 2018 · 36mins

Most Popular

Elon Musk

Barack Obama

Bill Gates

LeBron James

Mark Cuban

Michelle Obama

Melinda Gates

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Kevin Hart

Terry Crews

Mike Tyson

Episode artwork

Beating the Heat, Janus v. AFSCME, & Primary Races We're Still Watching

Play
Read more
On the latest episode of the Conduit Street Podcast, Kevin Kinnally and Michael Sanderson discuss how counties are helping their residents beat the heat, explore the potential impacts of the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Janus v. ASFCME, and review some of the county primary races that remain too close to call.
Jul 03 2018 · 34mins
Episode artwork

Ep. 127 - June 6, 2018: Rebecca Friedrichs on Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more
Later this month, the Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling in Janus v. AFSCME on whether public sector unions should be allowed to collect agency fees from employees who choose not to join the union.

The Court heard a similar case two years ago, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association.

On this week's podcast, Marty West talks with Rebecca Friedrichs, the lead plaintiff in that case, about agency fees, unions, and what to expect after Janus.
Jun 06 2018 · 25mins
Episode artwork

Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more

In this episode of Teacher Voice, Brendan and Cyndi take a deep dive into Janus v. AFSCME and how it will impact educators and their unions. They get an overview of the case from Evan Stone, E4E Co-Founder and Co-CEO. They also chat with Maddie Fennell, executive director of the Nebraska State Education Association, and two E4E members, Kallie Jones and Christina Kim. In addition, Brendan and Cyndi preview some of the results from a groundbreaking new survey: Voices from the Classroom: A survey of America's Educators. To learn more about this survey, visit: https://e4e.org/teachersurvey

Hosts: Brendan Sargent and Cyndi Reyes Producer: Jason Crow Music by: Eduardo Reyes Created by: Brendan Sargent & Educators for Excellence

Special thanks to: Evan Stone, Maddie Fennell, Kallie Jones, Christina Kim, Ciara Mentzer, Amal Karim, Kris Havens, Liz Warden, and Tyler Douse.

May 31 2018 · 52mins
Episode artwork

Lunch Discussion: Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more
Earlier this year the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. The case turns on the question of whether “agency fee” arrangements—which require workers to pay union fees to public sector unions to cover the unions’ activities other than political action—violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court previously found such mandatory union fees to be constitutional in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977). However, in 2016, the Supreme Court split 4-4 on this question in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association.

L. Camille Hebert, Carter C. Kissell Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University
William L. Messenger, Staff Attorney, National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation
Moderator: Robert Alt, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Buckeye Institute
Apr 19 2018 · 50mins
Episode artwork

Gun control, kid tackle football ban, recreational pot, Janus v. AFSCME - Ep. 24

Play
Read more

On this week's action-packed episode of Under the Dome:

* Gun control: Lawmakers debated bill inside the Capitol and hundreds rallied in support outside this week.

* Should kids under 12 be allowed to play organized tackle football? A bill at the Statehouse says no.

* Some in Illinois want to legalize the recreational use of marijuana. We don't have a bill about that yet. But we do have a bill that would put a question on the November ballot to get voters' opinions.

* Mark Janus, the state worker who is fighting AFSCME over whether he should be forced to pay fair-share union dues, was in D.C. this week as the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the case.

Mar 02 2018 · 25mins
Episode artwork

Courthouse Steps: Janus v. AFSCME

Play
Read more
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) is scheduled for oral argument in the Supreme Court on February 26. This important case will determine whether it is constitutional for public sector unions to require all employees to pay union fees regardless of their membership under the First Amendment. The ruling in Janus will also clarify whether the Court’s decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education to uphold these requirements will remain good law.
Ray J. LaJeunesse of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation joins us to discuss his impressions of oral argument.
Featuring:
Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr., Vice President and Legal Director, National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc.

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
Feb 27 2018 · 52mins
Loading