Cover image of McCoy v. Louisiana

McCoy v. Louisiana Podcasts

Read more

5 of The Best Podcast Episodes for McCoy v. Louisiana. A collection of podcasts episodes with or about McCoy v. Louisiana, often where they are interviewed.

Read more

5 of The Best Podcast Episodes for McCoy v. Louisiana. A collection of podcasts episodes with or about McCoy v. Louisiana, often where they are interviewed.

Updated daily with the latest episodes

Episode artwork

McCoy v. Louisiana - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

Play
Read more
On May 14, 2018, the Supreme Court decided McCoy v. Louisiana, a case considering whether defense counsel may--against the defendant’s express wishes--concede his client’s guilt in an effort to avoid the death penalty.
In 2008, Robert McCoy was indicted on three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of the mother, stepfather, and son of his estranged wife. McCoy pleaded not guilty, maintaining that he was out of state at the time of the murder. In 2010, his relationship with the court-appointed public defender broke down, and in March 2010 Larry English became McCoy’s defense attorney. English concluded that the evidence against McCoy was overwhelming and told McCoy that he would concede McCoy’s guilt in an effort to avoid the death penalty; McCoy adamantly opposed English’s strategy. At trial, English nevertheless indicated repeatedly to the jury that McCoy had caused the victims’ deaths and pleaded for mercy. McCoy protested unsuccessfully to the trial judge and was permitted to testify to his innocence, but was ultimately convicted and sentenced to death. The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that defense counsel had authority to concede guilt over McCoy’s objection as a strategy to avoid a death sentence. In light of a division of opinion among state courts of last resort on whether it is unconstitutional to allow defense counsel to concede guilt over the defendant’s intransigent and unambiguous objection, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.
By a vote of 6-3, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Louisiana Supreme Court and remanded the case for a new trial. In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to choose the fundamental objective of his defense and insist that counsel refrain from admitting guilt, even when counsel’s experience-based view is that confessing guilt offers the defendant the best chance to avoid the death penalty.
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court, which was joined by the Chief Justice, and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch.
To discuss the case, we have Jay Schweikert, Policy Analyst with the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice.
Jun 20 2018 · 15mins
Episode artwork

The Unbelievable Case of McCoy v. Louisiana

Play
Read more
Is it unconstitutional for defense counsel to concede the defendant's guilt over that defendant's express objection? In McCoy v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court has an opportunity to affirm that a competent defendant may play an important role in his own defense strategy. Jay Schweikert comments.

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Feb 12 2018 · 19mins
Episode artwork

Courthouse Steps: McCoy v. Louisiana

Play
Read more

Jan 22 2018 · 43mins
Episode artwork

SCOTUS McCoy v. Louisiana, Case No. 16-8255

Play
Read more
Sixth Amendment: Is it unconstitutional for defense counsel to concede an accused's guilt over the accused's express objection? - Argued: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 EST
Jan 13 2018 ·